| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Rocke_T_Sinetist Moderator
Joined: 26 Aug 2005 Posts: 2683 Location: DFW airport
|
Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 5:02 pm Post subject: Dell jeopardizing their staple clients? |
|
|
Is Dell risking their staple clients--business and institutional customers--with their shoddy Chinese-poison-dogfood hardware and BIOS? There are indications that they are.
All recent Dell consumer products--Vostro, Inspiron, Dimension, XPS--have had BIOS problems go unresolved through a half dozen revisions. They can't even control the fans, much less the display cards they get at cut rate from nvidia. This is from a compilation of Dell's own site.
Are they selling this same crap to business/institutional? They're all from the same vendor, Foxconn, a notorious hosebag. If they are, and business/institutional experiences the same failure/malfunction rate that consumers report, their relational business will be looking for another vendor, ANY other vendor who can supply their volume, and that's pretty much Lenovo or HP, who have managed to maintain some degree of product integrity while Dell has completely abandoned theirs.
English-language support for business won't pull them out of this. If a third of all new purchases fail within warranty, institutions will abandon Dell with the same fervor individual customers have. _________________ Rocke T Sinetist
as in, 'it doesn't take a...' |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sponsor
|
|
 |
incident_man Dances with Hate

Joined: 04 Sep 2007 Posts: 161 Location: walking in the middle of the street
|
Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 9:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I hope you're right, but I'd rather doubt it. If anything, when it comes to expenditures, business always goes with the lowest cost--that's why they hate unions. If workers unionise, it means more labour costs. If DHell continues to be the lowest bidder, it won't matter if the systems fail within warranty because the company won't have to pay for it, provided that DHell actually honours the warranty. Now if, all of a sudden, a business sees mass failures outside of warranty then that would be another story because it would mean added cost. _________________ Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
FallenAngel Super Hater
Joined: 21 Feb 2006 Posts: 1516
|
Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2008 12:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| incident_man wrote: | | I hope you're right, but I'd rather doubt it. If anything, when it comes to expenditures, business always goes with the lowest cost-- |
I'd agree with you to a degree, but the reality is, not all companies go with the lowest bidder these days.
Think of it through their perspective, they all know that Dell may have been the lowest price point for several years, but that has all but come to an end now with all major OEM's trimming costs to keep the price differences marginal at best. Then you have to consider that Company X very well may chew on the lowest bid back in the day, but with the rate of failure affecting productivity in the workplace, Company X is going to be far less inclined to go with the lowest bidder just to save money on the front end.
For most companies, back end losses are what they look for, not front end gains. Lost productivity of their workforce will see a lot of companies ask themselves if Dell is a worthwhile risk just because they can save pennies on the dollar up front. I know if I was a purchasing officer for my company, I'd rather spend the extra few pennies on the dollar up front to make sure I'm not losing thousands or more in lost productivity during use. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rocke_T_Sinetist Moderator
Joined: 26 Aug 2005 Posts: 2683 Location: DFW airport
|
Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2008 2:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If you have to buy 4 $600 systems to end up with 3 working ones at any given time, saving $25 off of each one is false economy to the tune of $525 compared to 3 $625 systems that work.
One guy on the Dell board says he always buys two, so that WHEN one quits he'll have parts to substitute to find out what's wrong.  _________________ Rocke T Sinetist
as in, 'it doesn't take a...' |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sponsor
|
|
 |
benner conscientious beginner
Joined: 30 Apr 2008 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 12:30 pm Post subject: i think the price difference will be more significant |
|
|
just looking online and seeing desktops for 329 CAD...
4 machines -> 1316 (Dell)
4 machines -> 2400 (Non Dell 600)
50% failure rate almost still works.
methinks they are being aggressive in thier pricing...
just my 2 cents  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rocke_T_Sinetist Moderator
Joined: 26 Aug 2005 Posts: 2683 Location: DFW airport
|
Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 1:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There is not a 2:1 price differential for comparable systems anywhere among the mainstream vendors. The differential was never that large at a given time.
There's a 2:1 differential between what computers cost in 1998 and what they cost now, mitigated by inflation. You have to compare same speeds, same memory, same drive array, same software complement.
Dell's lowball system was 3 chipset-generations obsolete when they were still selling it (Dimension 2400). That's because at that point Intel is selling chipsets at fleamarket prices. You can't compare that to a current-generation system. _________________ Rocke T Sinetist
as in, 'it doesn't take a...' |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ranter Regular Hater
Joined: 12 Aug 2008 Posts: 41 Location: Dell Hell / Ireland
|
Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 4:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| A retail oil company over here (ireland) recently changed from dell to hp/ibm after they had countless problems with dells machines, not being able to get support and the famous next day warranty. My own office is a telecommunications company which buys half dell half other providers. They used to be all dell but it became a joke when a telecommunications provider couldn't get their computers working to help their own customers. So companies are starting to pay attention |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Apathy Moderator
Joined: 15 May 2003 Posts: 510 Location: NOT at TMC any more
|
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
I agree with Ranter about companies taking notice. I know for a fact that a company in Austin that does remote backups for many businesses and government agencies recently got rid of all of their Dell servers and replaced them with Sun's because of all of the reliability issues they were having with the Dell servers. Now considering that servers are one of Dell's two primary "cash cows" (the other being laptops/notebooks), this little bit of information should be sending up a ton of "red flags" in the minds of many people. _________________ Q: How do you know Dell Management is lying to you?
A: Until proven otherwise, Assume EVERYTHING coming from Dell Management is a lie. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sponsor
|
|
 |
Ranter Regular Hater
Joined: 12 Aug 2008 Posts: 41 Location: Dell Hell / Ireland
|
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 6:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I think the NY law suit really opened peoples minds up that they weren't just having a bad experience with dell but this was 'the' experience they would always have! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|