Dell complaints Forum Index
Dell complaints
The #1 Dell complaint forum
 
FAQFAQ   SearchSearch  UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

I have Dell caught in their own legal trap...
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Dell complaints Forum Index -> The Good, Bad and Ugly
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Omega
Regular Hater


Joined: 05 Apr 2007
Posts: 32

PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2007 4:12 pm    Post subject: I have Dell caught in their own legal trap... Reply with quote

So, my relationship with Dell finally went sour - just over 30 days in. Didn't take long, and I was scared as hell this would happen.

I bought an inspiron 9400 over the phone in late March early April. Thought it would be a great laptop, save for a few kinks.

When the laptop got to me, the hard drive was making a clicking noise which I thought was nothing (power management, heads switching platters). The laptop functioned fine and was good enough to play World of Warcraft and do all kinds of funky stuff (the hardware specs aren't that bad!). Suffice to say, nothing could possibly have been wrong!

I couldn't have been further from the truth.

Just shy of what I discovered is a 30 day return window (never was told about this...) the hard drive ate its own ass. Now it sounds like a mini key cutter.
Knowing full well that if the system was going to fail within the first month, I'm probably dealing with a company that only produces lemons - I contacted them to return the laptop. My research online shows that the clicking was a symptom of the impending failure, and it was doing such since day one - sadly, I didn't know it was a symptom of a problem until it was too late...

Regardless, Dell decided they had the right to send me a refurbished part, which I thought was completely bogus. Sure enough, they sent me a refurb, and so far I have yet to open the package.

No, instead I contacted a slightly higher up contact I managed to discover at Dell and informed her that if Dell didn't accept a return of the laptop (I even offered to cover shipping!), I'd be reversing charges on them.
Her response was very blithe and rather apathetic to my situation and in rather long words said "haha, no".

Until this point with her, I hadn't revealed my trump card...

I haven't once agreed to any terms of sales, service or use with Dell. Neither on the phone, or in the confirmation receipt email (or the second shipment I had to get made after cancelling the first because of a shipping address cockup) did Dell ever serve me any terms of sale.

All I was told on the phone was that it had a one year warranty. Not a LIMITED warranty, just a warranty. Never was I told of a 30 day return window, that warranty would be with used parts after the 30 day window (hmm, wonder why they do that...), or any other detail. My only assumption was that Dell would be a decent company and do the right thing by providing quality, outstanding service.

Ah, now you say "but you agreed to these terms when you booted the machine..."
Thankfully I didn't, as I was running Ubuntu on the laptop, and not once did I run Windows on the machine.

So, long story short:
o No terms at sale.
o No terms in confirmation email.
o No agreement to laptop agreement.

ONE chargeback for breaching my terms of sale. Which by the way do say "one year warranty", but make no effort to scope limitations of the warranty. Consequently, Dell breached the terms by shipping defective equipment, refusing to accept a refund of equipment that was defective within their 30 day window and last but not least - VERY bad customer service.

If you've not once agreed to anything, you have a leg up with your credit card issuer. Reverse charges on Dell because their poor terms of sale which you can only see AFTER paying them are not in any way enforceable.

Terms of sale and the product must be arranged prior to payment and an agreement secured prior to payment. Anything else is just holding your rights hostage.

In the end, if the charges get reversed (and there's little doubt in my mind with the reputation Dell has going for them), they can pay me inconvenience and handling penalty fees for the bullshit they put me through if they want their laptop back. I have been without this machine for over a week now. Why should I suffer and they be allowed to do this to people unpunished? Greedy slimebags.

Any questions or possible discussion?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sponsor

Rocke_T_Sinetist
Moderator


Joined: 26 Aug 2005
Posts: 2590
Location: DFW airport

PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2007 6:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jumping ahead to the bottom line, Dell already has more attorneys than you can afford to hire, more than the credit card company will be willing to pony up on your behalf, to prove that issue. Read the terms again. I think you'll find a phrase in there that makes them effective whether you actively acknowledged them or not. The 'click to proceed' is a license agreement for the software, unrelated to TOS.

Terms do specify 'refurb' replacement parts. It's cheesy on Dell's part, because the vendor reimburses them for warranty parts. Dell just has an inventory of returned parts that test good so the vendor will NOT pay them, and they offload them onto warranty claimants. Not illegal, not even unethical as long as they disclose it, but pisses a lot of people off.

As a credit-card retailer Dell MUST respond to chargebacks. Here's the catch: To cancel the charge, the shipment must be returned. Dell will refuse to issue an RMA, or at the very best drag their feet hoping you will give up. If you return a shipment without RMA, they can refuse it (I think that's what they do) or accept and keep it without ever acknowledging receipt. That's why the person you talked with laughed.

When you're dealing with shysters, you have to figure they have already plugged most of the normal channels which would otherwise give you recourse.
_________________
Rocke T Sinetist
as in, 'it doesn't take a...'
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Omega
Regular Hater


Joined: 05 Apr 2007
Posts: 32

PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2007 6:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rocke_T_Sinetist wrote:
Jumping ahead to the bottom line, Dell already has more attorneys than you can afford to hire, more than the credit card company will be willing to pony up on your behalf, to prove that issue.


In Canada, companies like Dell aren't as capable of steamrolling customers and I strongly doubt they'd even go to court. We're a slightly - if only a bit - less litigious country.

Rocke_T_Sinetist wrote:
Read the terms again. I think you'll find a phrase in there that makes them effective whether you actively acknowledged them or not. The 'click to proceed' is a license agreement for the software, unrelated to TOS.


That's the problem, I didn't even allow it to be shown to me. I didn't even agree to it. Windows was not even run on the laptop.
The only things I know about it are those things I can glean from what Dell tries to leverage from it.
Contracts of adhesion really don't work like that. You can't force a contract on someone - that would be like me mailing you a letter saying you owe me your car because you opened it. They really don't have much strength because one side of the party was never given the opportunity to affect the contract. Once again, if it wasn't at the time of sale, my CC will likely frown upon anything Dell tries to sneak in the keyhole.

Rocke_T_Sinetist wrote:
Terms do specify 'refurb' replacement parts. It's cheesy on Dell's part, because the vendor reimburses them for warranty parts. Dell just has an inventory of returned parts that test good so the vendor will NOT pay them, and they offload them onto warranty claimants. Not illegal, not even unethical as long as they disclose it, but pisses a lot of people off.


Oh yes. I've worked computer wholesale, I'm fully aware of what they do, and it vexes me. But again, you're referring to terms I was not served at the time of sale and terms I was not ever even made aware of in my first purchase summary.

Rocke_T_Sinetist wrote:
As a credit-card retailer Dell MUST respond to chargebacks.


What do you mean by "respond"? They can or can't, Dell can't re-charge me through the credit card though, as that would violate their merchant agreement.

Rocke_T_Sinetist wrote:
Here's the catch: To cancel the charge, the shipment must be returned. Dell will refuse to issue an RMA, or at the very best drag their feet hoping you will give up. If you return a shipment without RMA, they can refuse it (I think that's what they do) or accept and keep it without ever acknowledging receipt. That's why the person you talked with laughed.


Again, if charges are reversed, the responsibility is on Dell to reclaim the laptop from me. Payment was already agreed to over the phone and Dell breached that agreement - as such the charges would be reversed.
If Dell requested via the CC that I return the laptop, it would be only a request.
If they decide to go after my credit, I need only contact Equifax with the corresponding information and breach of purchase agreement, and they'd have it cleared up in perhaps three to four months.
If they decide to send credit collectors, I write them one letter saying "make good on your threats or go away", and they mark my account as "unrecoverable".

Rocke_T_Sinetist wrote:
When you're dealing with shysters, you have to figure they have already plugged most of the normal channels which would otherwise give you recourse.


Here in Canada, some holes are un-pluggable. I've been doing homework already - I don't doubt in the states though, Dell drives a much bigger steamroller.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rocke_T_Sinetist
Moderator


Joined: 26 Aug 2005
Posts: 2590
Location: DFW airport

PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2007 7:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm not speaking antogonistically about your case, and such confrontations CAN be won. Just saying it's come up before and Dell has a 'solution' to it. If they put 1/10 the effort into making and supporting products that they put into snowballing customers, they would be an exemplary company.

But I worked there and that is NOT their focus. It's getting your money and keeping it. Period. I think you've figured that out adequately though.

As you may also have surmised, Dell's mission is to screw EVERYBODY, their customers, their employees, their vendors. Just so you know what you're up against. They have been sued repeatedly on all those issues. The NY Attorney General has a current lawsuit against Dell for almost exactly the conditions you describe, plus financing scams.

Pursue it, mate. Determination DOES resolve some Dell customer-satisfaction issues. But not all.
_________________
Rocke T Sinetist
as in, 'it doesn't take a...'
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Sponsor
Omega
Regular Hater


Joined: 05 Apr 2007
Posts: 32

PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2007 8:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rocke_T_Sinetist wrote:
I'm not speaking antogonistically about your case, and such confrontations CAN be won. Just saying it's come up before and Dell has a 'solution' to it. If they put 1/10 the effort into making and supporting products that they put into snowballing customers, they would be an exemplary company.

But I worked there and that is NOT their focus. It's getting your money and keeping it. Period. I think you've figured that out adequately though.

As you may also have surmised, Dell's mission is to screw EVERYBODY, their customers, their employees, their vendors. Just so you know what you're up against. They have been sued repeatedly on all those issues. The NY Attorney General has a current lawsuit against Dell for almost exactly the conditions you describe, plus financing scams.

Pursue it, mate. Determination DOES resolve some Dell customer-satisfaction issues. But not all.


Hey, you know what - I've taken just about every piece of constructive criticism and improved how I explain the situation. The only thing I usually don't stand up for is when people defend Dells practices and claim they're normal or at the very least respectable. Those kinds of people just get to me because they'll take any abuse from a company... I'm not that type, I stick up for myself and always ensure I get the best.

If anything, bring up as much as you can so that if it ever comes to anything, I've got enough ammo to keep one finger ahead of Dell.

Although - mind you, I don't have to make anything up. The writing is on the wall, especially with the receipt email I was provided with the day of the purchase. Or the emails sent to me after a replacement order was made due to a shipping address screwup.

I don't think it'll take much at all to ensure that Dell loses 100% in this situation.

Again, any more ideas or angles you can think of, let me know! Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rocke_T_Sinetist
Moderator


Joined: 26 Aug 2005
Posts: 2590
Location: DFW airport

PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2007 8:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

By no means do I defend Dell as 'reasonable or normal'. Their retail practices redefine retailing, and not for the better.

Dell adopted the 'refutation of merchantability' from Microsoft. It has been upheld in court, even though it goes against common-law legal practice dating to the dawn of commerce.

The reason it works for them is that nobody in the buying public has any precedence for anticipating it. Well, they should. This is retail in the next century.

The seller positions itself as an adversary. Sociologically, zero difference between that and the 5th-grade schoolyard bully who outweighs his classmates 2 to 1.
_________________
Rocke T Sinetist
as in, 'it doesn't take a...'
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Omega
Regular Hater


Joined: 05 Apr 2007
Posts: 32

PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2007 11:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rocke_T_Sinetist wrote:
By no means do I defend Dell as 'reasonable or normal'. Their retail practices redefine retailing, and not for the better.

Dell adopted the 'refutation of merchantability' from Microsoft. It has been upheld in court, even though it goes against common-law legal practice dating to the dawn of commerce.

The reason it works for them is that nobody in the buying public has any precedence for anticipating it. Well, they should. This is retail in the next century.

The seller positions itself as an adversary. Sociologically, zero difference between that and the 5th-grade schoolyard bully who outweighs his classmates 2 to 1.


"refutation of merchantability"?

Do you mean to say that they claim the product is good for nothing, and they may as well be sending you nothing at all?

It sounds like something that would stand up in the US, but not in Canada.

Please explain...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ghost_of_Roundrock
Forum Troll
Forum Troll


Joined: 21 Apr 2006
Posts: 29

PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2007 12:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Omega,

I have read your entire post. You failed to understand one of many things. Dell has already received the money for the system that you have in your grabby little hands. While you can request a chargeback on your credit card, the only party that is out of money is the credit card company. The credit card company may give you the money back, but they did not get it from Dell Inc.

As far as the topic of “30 days” goes, Dell does not have a 30 day return policy. They have a 21 day return policy. Dell made this change in ’04 (if memory serves me correct). Dell is counting on you (as the consumer) to forget this little change in the 21 day return policy. This goes from the date of invoice (the date it shipped).

Now let’s talk about the “Terms of Service” (TOS) and the “Terms of Agreement” (TOA). You accepted both of these causes when you opened the box. If you check the literature that came with you system you should find a “Drop – In” in the box that explains this. Drop – Ins are pieces of paper that they put in the box as it goes to shipping to be delivered to your home\office.

On to the next topic of your post, “Refurbished parts”. When you accepted the TOA, explained earlier in this post, it has a cause that states Dell can send you refurbished replacement parts. This can include everything about the system. Even a system exchange can be refurbished. Dell has all of this in a document on the web, and yes as far as Dell is concerned YOU DID ACCEPT IT.


Dell has tried, very vigorously, to think of every way to keep your money. They have more layers of confusion when it comes to the protection of its money. The simple fact is once Dell has your money, now it is theirs and “Come Hell and High Water” before you will get their money back to you.

I was once an employee of DHell. I was a 4 year veteran of technical support & a 2 year rookie in the training department before I saw the writing on the wall. I left DHell in ’05 and never looked back. I was able to get out before the US government probes into the financial aspect of the company. I do not now or further more want to be associated with this company. The backstabbing and double dealing with the customers, vendors and employees was enough for me to leave the company and not list them on my resume. I hope you are able to get your money back; however you are looking for a fight that you may not win. I wish great success in getting this done. You do need to understand that you do not have a leg up in this situation; Dell already has your money.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sponsor
Omega
Regular Hater


Joined: 05 Apr 2007
Posts: 32

PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2007 9:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ghost_of_Roundrock wrote:
Omega,

I have read your entire post. You failed to understand one of many things. Dell has already received the money for the system that you have in your grabby little hands. While you can request a chargeback on your credit card, the only party that is out of money is the credit card company. The credit card company may give you the money back, but they did not get it from Dell Inc.


Not really. When the cc issuer does the chargeback, Dell won't get the money. Credit card transactions are made up of multiple steps and the right to reverse charges exists for 60 days following posting of the transaction.

Ghost_of_Roundrock wrote:
As far as the topic of “30 days” goes, Dell does not have a 30 day return policy. They have a 21 day return policy. Dell made this change in ’04 (if memory serves me correct). Dell is counting on you (as the consumer) to forget this little change in the 21 day return policy. This goes from the date of invoice (the date it shipped).


I think you've been out of the loop for a while now - as Dell does in fact have a 30 day return policy. That's one of the things their support representatives used against me saying "well you're past 30 days", when really the hardware was malfunctioning since day one.

Ghost_of_Roundrock wrote:
Now let’s talk about the “Terms of Service” (TOS) and the “Terms of Agreement” (TOA). You accepted both of these causes when you opened the box. If you check the literature that came with you system you should find a “Drop – In” in the box that explains this. Drop – Ins are pieces of paper that they put in the box as it goes to shipping to be delivered to your home\office.


You can't do that really. You can't serve terms to someone following the purchase. That would invalidate the purchase on the spot because it was not agreed upon at the time of payment. You have to know what you're buying otherwise the product is not as described. Are you sure you read everything I said so far?

Ghost_of_Roundrock wrote:
On to the next topic of your post, “Refurbished parts”. When you accepted the TOA, explained earlier in this post, it has a cause that states Dell can send you refurbished replacement parts. This can include everything about the system. Even a system exchange can be refurbished. Dell has all of this in a document on the web, and yes as far as Dell is concerned YOU DID ACCEPT IT.


No, no I didn't. Their claim to such really isn't enforceable, and just because Dell takes a one-way approach to abusing customers doesn't mean I'm beholden to it.

Ghost_of_Roundrock wrote:
Dell has tried, very vigorously, to think of every way to keep your money. They have more layers of confusion when it comes to the protection of its money. The simple fact is once Dell has your money, now it is theirs and “Come Hell and High Water” before you will get their money back to you.


Well, not really. Because in getting back my money, I choose to go over their head. Your assumption is that everything I'm doing involves dealing with them. That's simply not the case. When dealing with the CC issuer, they call the shots, not Dell and if Dell drags their heels, the CC issuer just gets pissed off.

Ghost_of_Roundrock wrote:
I was once an employee of DHell. I was a 4 year veteran of technical support & a 2 year rookie in the training department before I saw the writing on the wall. I left DHell in ’05 and never looked back. I was able to get out before the US government probes into the financial aspect of the company. I do not now or further more want to be associated with this company. The backstabbing and double dealing with the customers, vendors and employees was enough for me to leave the company and not list them on my resume. I hope you are able to get your money back; however you are looking for a fight that you may not win. I wish great success in getting this done. You do need to understand that you do not have a leg up in this situation; Dell already has your money.


Dell doesn't have the money. With CC payment, funds take a long time to be released and I think you're giving them too much credit. As a consumer and likely because I'm in Canada, the rules are different. The right to reverse charges is always there and I do it solely on the basis that Dell invalidated our (between me and them) purchase agreement.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mideastcoast!BT
Dances with Hate


Joined: 28 Jun 2003
Posts: 173

PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2007 11:28 am    Post subject: Charge Backs Reply with quote

As a former ownere of a business, I had one customer that tried to do a charge back. I was given so many days to respond and give my side of the story. In this case they sided with me and I got my money. I asked what would have happenned if they had sided with the customer. Their response was we would have withdrawn the money from my bank. If there was not enough money, they would have with held future charges until they had it all.
So in this case, if the charge back was sucessfull, dell does not have his money.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rocke_T_Sinetist
Moderator


Joined: 26 Aug 2005
Posts: 2590
Location: DFW airport

PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2007 12:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Refutation of merchantability only applies to software. Essentially they license you to attempt to use it, but they bear no liability if you can't make it do what they implied it would or even if you can't make it work at all. The only thing that is guaranteed is the integrity of the copying process they made the disc (hard goods) with.

R of M is not applied to hard goods, but prior to adoption by the software industry, no merchant could expect to get away with R of M at all. What Dell did, was say "well they got away with that, let's see what WE can get away with." There are precedents for refurb warranty parts, Zenith used to do that (and look what happened to them). I did warranty service for all the Japanese electronic brands and NONE used refurbs, EVER. I don't know about big things like cars and large appliances. Appliance parts typically aren't candidates for refurbishing. Car parts can be bought refurb for a reduced price on the aftermarket, but as far as I know if your Ford water pump fails in warranty you get a factory-new one.

So what Dell is doing amounts to bogosity creep right up to the line they think they can get away with. This includes their agents stonewalling you, effectively making the warranty inaccessable. It includes advertising 'no-interest' financing then charging you 30% APR because it 'turned out' you didn't qualify. The NY AG is suing them on all these issues on behalf of State residents, but as much to create a political opportunity as anything.

Proceed with your proceeding, and let us know how it turns out. I think you're right, corporations don't own the government in Canada like they do here.
_________________
Rocke T Sinetist
as in, 'it doesn't take a...'
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Omega
Regular Hater


Joined: 05 Apr 2007
Posts: 32

PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2007 1:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rocke_T_Sinetist wrote:
Refutation of merchantability only applies to software. Essentially they license you to attempt to use it, but they bear no liability if you can't make it do what they implied it would or even if you can't make it work at all. The only thing that is guaranteed is the integrity of the copying process they made the disc (hard goods) with.

R of M is not applied to hard goods, but prior to adoption by the software industry, no merchant could expect to get away with R of M at all. What Dell did, was say "well they got away with that, let's see what WE can get away with." There are precedents for refurb warranty parts, Zenith used to do that (and look what happened to them). I did warranty service for all the Japanese electronic brands and NONE used refurbs, EVER. I don't know about big things like cars and large appliances. Appliance parts typically aren't candidates for refurbishing. Car parts can be bought refurb for a reduced price on the aftermarket, but as far as I know if your Ford water pump fails in warranty you get a factory-new one.

So what Dell is doing amounts to bogosity creep right up to the line they think they can get away with. This includes their agents stonewalling you, effectively making the warranty inaccessable. It includes advertising 'no-interest' financing then charging you 30% APR because it 'turned out' you didn't qualify. The NY AG is suing them on all these issues on behalf of State residents, but as much to create a political opportunity as anything.

Proceed with your proceeding, and let us know how it turns out. I think you're right, corporations don't own the government in Canada like they do here.


Yes, I find that this is the trend for a lot of companies these days. Even though some might rise above the practice, the vast majority are trying to cut costs by reducing the overall quality of the product.
This is likely due to residual brand strength from the 1990s where products sold generally speaking were a bit hardier than they are nowadays. With resources and commodities skyrocketing not only in acquisition but also transportation costs, companies are faced with keeping the books balanced.

This cut has been made by attempting to leverage the brand and perhaps a reputation and reduce the overall quality of the product. All this while making claims for things like being energy conscious and environmentally friendly. You'll find that your "today dollar" gets you far less today than your "yesterday dollar" did yesterday, this is because consumers have become complacent.

I spit in the face of this practice and I think there is no way as a consumer I can essentially be legally moored into buying nothing. There's not a fleck of soluble sense in that. When you buy something, it MUST come with a particular degree of assurance.

Claims like "hardware fails" and the wholesale distribution of low standard ideologies don't cut it for me because the choice was the company's in the first place to produce a product that requires excuses.

Specifically to Dell, they only further incriminate themselves and compromise their reputation by relying so desperately on legal lobster traps.

It's like I tell lots of people. Dell wants to ship empty boxes, and eventually for environments' sake, send you empty e-boxes.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sponsor
Rocke_T_Sinetist
Moderator


Joined: 26 Aug 2005
Posts: 2590
Location: DFW airport

PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2007 2:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

'People telling people' what a hosebag Dell is, is a) what we're here for, b) why Dell stock has fallen as much as HP's has risen in the same time, and c) Dell knew it would happen and did it anyway.

They knew that for every customer they pissed off, they could attract 100 new ones with claims like 'Complete system $299', 'Zero-interest financing', and 'Award-winning service'. All short-term expedients to make quarterly results match predictions, with no consideration whatsoever for anything beyond that.

Look at their print ads. There's 10x more disclaimers than copy. That it takes them a full inch across a full page to print disclaimers in the smallest font the medium supports, should tell potential customers something about what they're up to.

I spit in the face of corporate manipulation too. But as a metaphor for cultural disease, Dell is just an ingrown hair. China ships us toxic food. Monsanto alters the genetics of the food chain without any oversight whatsoever. US car companies haven't made a respectable product since 1970, only their ads have gotten better. Have a wholesome treat of microwave popcorn? The butter flavoring dust kills the workers that make it. The oil-proof bag coating releases perfluorooctanoic acid, a carcinogen in EVERY American's bloodstream.

It's coming to a point where you have to pick your battles, and the enemies are entrenched and amorphous specifically so as to make them invulnerable.
_________________
Rocke T Sinetist
as in, 'it doesn't take a...'
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Omega
Regular Hater


Joined: 05 Apr 2007
Posts: 32

PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2007 3:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rocke_T_Sinetist wrote:
'People telling people' what a hosebag Dell is, is a) what we're here for, b) why Dell stock has fallen as much as HP's has risen in the same time, and c) Dell knew it would happen and did it anyway.

They knew that for every customer they pissed off, they could attract 100 new ones with claims like 'Complete system $299', 'Zero-interest financing', and 'Award-winning service'. All short-term expedients to make quarterly results match predictions, with no consideration whatsoever for anything beyond that.

Look at their print ads. There's 10x more disclaimers than copy. That it takes them a full inch across a full page to print disclaimers in the smallest font the medium supports, should tell potential customers something about what they're up to.

I spit in the face of corporate manipulation too. But as a metaphor for cultural disease, Dell is just an ingrown hair. China ships us toxic food. Monsanto alters the genetics of the food chain without any oversight whatsoever. US car companies haven't made a respectable product since 1970, only their ads have gotten better. Have a wholesome treat of microwave popcorn? The butter flavoring dust kills the workers that make it. The oil-proof bag coating releases perfluorooctanoic acid, a carcinogen in EVERY American's bloodstream.

It's coming to a point where you have to pick your battles, and the enemies are entrenched and amorphous specifically so as to make them invulnerable.


I very much agree.

But this is one battle I know I'll win and indeed I have backed down from others in the past.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
slinky317
Regular Hater


Joined: 14 Apr 2006
Posts: 12

PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2007 9:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Omega,
You will not win this case. I'm sorry to be so blunt, but it's a fact. Other people seem to have told this to you nicely but you're not listening.

First of all, let's cover the Terms and Conditions. In one of the opening lines, the terms say:

Quote:
These terms and conditions ("Agreement") apply to your purchase of computer systems and/or related products and/or services and support sold in the United States ("Product"). By accepting delivery of the Product, you accept and are bound to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. If you do not wish to be bound by this Agreement, you must notify Dell and return your purchase pursuant to Dell's Return Policy. (See: http://www.dell.com/policy/legal/warranty.htm.)


The system cannot be ordered without the customer agreeing to the T&C. Sales Reps have to click a button and if they do not do that, the sale will not take place. And since you accepted the shipment, you have accepted the T&C.

Now, regarding the return policy that you rudely told someone they were "out of the loop too long" and that it was a 30 day policy, here is the policy:

Quote:
Hardware Products and Accessories: Unless you have a separate agreement with Dell or except as provided in the section below, all hardware, accessories, peripherals, parts and software that is unopened and still in its/their sealed package or, if delivered electronically, that has not been downloaded, may be returned within twenty-one (21) days from the date on the packing slip or invoice for a credit or a refund of the purchase price paid, less shipping and handling and applicable restocking fees.


Granted, there are exceptions to this rule that allow for 30 days of return, but those are only for PowerEdge, PowerConnect, and PowerVault systems - none of which apply to you.

You do have a warranty on your system - yes, you will get a refurbished part, but that is misleading. A lot of refurbed parts are cancelled orders that never shipped, so the part is practically new. Does it suck? Yes. Is it clearly written in the T&C and in the warranty agreement? Yes - it says they will replace your parts with new OR refurbed parts.

Sorry man, but I say bite the bullet on this one and go with the part they sent you. It will save you quite a headache in the longrun.

And in case you're wondering, here are the URLs for the T&C and the warranty/return agreements:
http://www.dell.com/content/topics/global.aspx/policy/en/policy?itemtype=CFG&s=bsd&l=en&cs=04&c=us&~lt=popup&~section=012#ustc
http://www.dell.com/content/topics/global.aspx/policy/en/policy?c=us&cs=04&l=en&s=bsd&~section=010

Oh, and also... when you go to the store and buy a shirt, does that store read off the terms and conditions for that shirt or the complete return policy before you pay for it? Of course not. Instead, that information is posted on walls of the store, and it is your responsibility to read it and acknowledge it. Dell's T&C are located, albeit slightly tucked away, on their website. And as mentioned before, the sales rep you were working on clicked that you acknowledged and agreed to the terms, and by accepting the package you agreed to them even further.

Also, your claim that the Terms and Conditions were not in your e-mail are false. Your e-mail should read, at the bottom:

Quote:
Your order is subject to Dell's Terms and Conditions of Sale which include a binding arbitration provision.


There is even a link to click on so you can read the T&C.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Dell complaints Forum Index -> The Good, Bad and Ugly All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 1 of 5

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This is not a Dell Forum